<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Pennsylvania Votes Forum</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/</link><description>Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Keystone State.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Debug Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>Who's playing budget games?</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/08/20/who-s-playing-budget-games.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:252</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;As many expected, &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/state/pennsylvania/20090819_ap_pasenaterejectsattempttooverridebudgetveto.html" class="null"&gt;Senate Republicans fell short&lt;/a&gt; in their effort to override several of the Governor&amp;#39;s line-item vetoes in &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=95579" class="null"&gt;Senate Bill 850&lt;/a&gt; (the state budget). Thirty-three votes total were needed for override, and only one Democrat, &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?EntityID=17422&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;Sen. Lisa Boscola&lt;/a&gt; of the Lehigh Valley, joined with all 29 Republicans in the Senate in the veto override effort. Republicans were trying to override the vetoes of line items in the budget which were funded at an &amp;quot;agreed to&amp;quot; level by the administration and Democrats and Republicans in the General Assembly. Why Rendell vetoed those line items in the first place points to gamesmanship by the Rendell administration, and yet it was Senate Democrat Leader Bob Mellow of Scranton who had the audacity to accuse Senate Republicans of &amp;quot;playing games.&amp;quot; Who do YOU think is playing games, given that Rendell line-item vetoed funding for several programs in the state budget despite such funding being equal to, or in excess of, that which he requested?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=252" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Rendell/default.aspx">Rendell</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Boscola/default.aspx">Boscola</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Mellow/default.aspx">Mellow</category></item><item><title>Attempt at Overriding Rendell's Vetoes</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/08/19/attempt-at-overriding-rendell-s-vetoes.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:251</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;According to Patriot-News &lt;a href="http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2009/08/senate_gop_override_would_rele.html" class="null"&gt;journalist Charlie Thompson&lt;/a&gt;, the Senate Republicans will attempt to override Governor Rendell&amp;#39;s vetoes of several line items in Senate Bill 850 (the state budget, a.ka. the &amp;quot;bridge budget&amp;quot;). A veto override requires a two-thirds vote of both the state House and Senate, which would mean 33 Senators and 135 Representatives. Republicans currently have 29 voting Senators and 97 voting Representatives, meaning they&amp;#39;ll need significant help from Democrats in both chambers for veto override efforts to succeed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=251" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Rendell/default.aspx">Rendell</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/veto/default.aspx">veto</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/override/default.aspx">override</category></item><item><title>Dems Flirt with State Sales Tax Expansion</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/08/18/dems-flirt-with-state-sales-tax-expansion.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:250</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The latest development in state budget negotiations seems to be a flirtation with &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsitem.com/news/sales_tax_extension_debated" class="null"&gt;an expansion of the state sales tax by Democrats&lt;/a&gt;. Various press reports in recent weeks had indicated that broad-based tax increases were supposedly &amp;quot;off the table.&amp;quot; But now Democrats are toying with the idea of eliminating some of the current exemptions from the state sales tax, such as those for candy and gum, and perhaps those for certain services, such as laundry and dry cleaning. Do you favor an expansion of the sales tax, or would you rather see the state cut spending in order to erase the $3.3 billion state revenue shortfall?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=250" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/sales+tax/default.aspx">sales tax</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Democrats/default.aspx">Democrats</category></item><item><title>Rendell Line-item Vetoes Budget</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/08/06/rendell-line-item-vetoes-budget.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:246</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;A state budget was finally sent to Gov. Rendell&amp;#39;s desk (&lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/RollCall.aspx?ID=417757" class="null"&gt;Senate Bill 850&lt;/a&gt;), which passed with only a &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/RollCall.aspx?ID=417757" class="null"&gt;handful of negative votes&lt;/a&gt; in the House. However, the Governor chose to use his power of the line-item veto to &amp;quot;blue-line&amp;quot; all spending in the bill except that which is necessary to pay state workers. So this leaves much unresolved, and a lot or more intense negotiating is to come in the coming weeks and months. Senate Bill 850 was a relatively lean budget of $27.3 billion that held the line on taxes while providing a generous increase in basic education subsidies (11 percent increase per school district on average). To be continued...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=246" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Rendell/default.aspx">Rendell</category></item><item><title>Blue Dogs Heel</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/08/04/blue-dogs-heel.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:242</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, the budget saga took another strange twist as the Blue Dog Democrats in the House have apparently withdrawn their compromise budget proposal they had reportedly forged with House Repubicans. The Commonwealth Foundation&amp;#39;s Nate Benefield sums things up nicely with &lt;a href="http://cfpolicyblog.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-is-going-on-with-pennsylvania.html" class="null"&gt;this post on PolicyBlog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=242" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Blue+Dogs/default.aspx">Blue Dogs</category></item><item><title>Blue Dogs Finally Bark? </title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/08/03/blue-dogs-finally-bark.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:241</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;According to a&lt;a href="http://www.lobbytracpa.com/roarty/index.php?aid=57" class="null"&gt; report by PA politics scribe Alex Roarty&lt;/a&gt;, the state House Blue Dog (fiscally conservative) Democrats will unveil a compromise on the state budget crafted with House Republicans. The measure will be introduced as an amendment to Senate Bill 850, a relatively lean plan that House Democrat leadership had been letting languish in committee. This compromise reportedly will not require any tax increases. But for the &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/RollCall.aspx?ID=415588" class="null"&gt;votes of John Pallone and Joe Petrarca against their leadership&amp;#39;s plan to spend $2 billion more than the Senate Republican plan&lt;/a&gt;, the House Blue Dog Democrats have been more akin to French poodles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=241" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Pallone/default.aspx">Pallone</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Blue+Dogs/default.aspx">Blue Dogs</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Petrarca/default.aspx">Petrarca</category></item><item><title>Rendell breaks up Conference Committee</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/31/rendell-breaks-up-conference-committee.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:239</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Calling the budget Conference Committee of six legislative leaders a &amp;quot;circus,&amp;quot; &lt;a href="http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/s_636100.html" class="null"&gt;Gov. Rendell has intervened&lt;/a&gt; by inviting Sen. Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi and House Majority Appropriations Committee Chairman Dwight Evans to the mansion for talks. The move brought jeers from activists, lamenting that the new era of transparency only lasted a couple days and the we were ostensibly returning to the bad old days of a backroom deal. Rendell insists, however, his meetings with Pileggi and Evans will be sunshined in accordance with the law. Stay tuned....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=239" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Rendell/default.aspx">Rendell</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Pileggi/default.aspx">Pileggi</category></item><item><title>Budget Conference Committee Begins</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/30/budget-conference-committee-begins.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:238</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;State budget negotiations have entered the &amp;quot;Conference Committee&amp;quot; phase. In a Conference Committee, House and Senate leaders meet to form a compromise they believe can gather the support of a majority of rank-and-file Representatives and Senators. The Conference Committee comprises: Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi, Senate Appopriations Committee Majority Chairman Jake Corman, Senate Appropriations Committee Minority Chairman Jay Costa, House Minority Leader Samuel Smith, House Majority Leader Todd Eachus, and House Appropriations Committee Majority Chairman Dwight Evans. The Conference Committee will be meeting at 9 a.m. this morning. For the first time ever, the budget Conference Committee meetings are open to the press and public, which is by itself no small victory for taxpayers. You can watch the Conference Committee meetings on PCN (&lt;a href="http://www.pcntv.com/" class="null"&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=238" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category></item><item><title>Budget Update: House to Senate: NO</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/22/budget-update-house-to-senate-no.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:224</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The House has rejected the Senate&amp;#39;s amendments to the state budget &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=95878" class="null"&gt;(HB 1416),&lt;/a&gt; which pared spending down even more, to $27.1 billion. The vote was 49-150 (I hope to have the precise roll call up shortly, my apologies for the delay). What happens next is anyone&amp;#39;s guess. It&amp;#39;s likely the Senate will insist on its amendments, which would throw the budget to a &amp;quot;conference committee,&amp;quot; whereby each legislative caucus sends representation to haggle a compromise. Senate Rs will send two members, appointed by Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi. Senate Ds will send one member, appointed by Minority Leader Bob Mellow. House Ds will send two members appointed by Majority Leader Todd Eachus. House Rs will send one member appointed by Minority Leader Sam Smith. On the House floor last evening, Eachus said the process would move briskly apace, saying it would be wrapped up &amp;quot;in days.&amp;quot; We shall see. The compromise hammered out by the conference committee must be voted upon by the full House and Senate. Key factors to consider: there are purported to be as many as 20 fiscally conservative, aka &amp;quot;blue dog,&amp;quot; Democrats who opposed any broad-based tax increases. Senate and House Republicans remain firmly opposed to such tax increases as well. Republicans, even with Democrat defector Lisa Boscola in the Senate and those 20 blue dog Democrats in the House, do not have the two-thirds vote strength required to overrided a Rendell veto. Rendell could, as he did in 2003, employ a line-item veto. Stay tuned...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=224" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Rendell/default.aspx">Rendell</category></item><item><title>PA Budget Battle: California Dreamin'? </title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/21/pa-budget-battle-california-dreamin.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:223</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The Golden State&amp;#39;s legislature and Gov. Schwarzenegger have finally reached a state budget deal that does not comprise a tax increase, even though California&amp;#39;s budget shortfall, north of $26 billion, is almost as large as PA&amp;#39;s entire General Fund! This might be a strong positive omen for taxpayers in the Keystone State. Indeed, Senate Republicans, led by Lt. Gov./President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, just took the budget sent to them by House Democrats (and favored by Gov. Rendell) &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/RollCall.aspx?ID=415826" class="null"&gt;and pared it back down to a no-tax-increase level. A Senate Democrat, Lisa Boscola, joined with the Republicans in supporting the measure.&lt;/a&gt; This will most likely produce a &amp;quot;conference committee&amp;quot; whereby each of the four legislative caucuses (Senate Rs, House Rs, Senate Ds, House Ds) will send representation into a closed-door meeting to hammer out a compromise. Given the determined opposition to a tax increase by House and Senate Republicans, and 20 or so fiscally conservative (aka Blue Dog) Democrats, PA taxpayers perhaps have reason to actually be California Dreamin&amp;#39;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=223" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Boscola/default.aspx">Boscola</category></item><item><title>House Dems Shoot Down No-Tax Increase Budget</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/17/house-dems-shoot-down-no-tax-increase-budget.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:218</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Along party lines (but for Philly-area Republican Dennis O&amp;#39;Brien crossing the aisle), the Democrat-led state House of Representatives last evening &lt;a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/state/pennsylvania/20090716_ap_pahouserejectsgopbudgetthathadnonewtaxes.html" class="null"&gt;voted down (103-95) a state budget that would have held the line on taxes&lt;/a&gt;. The fiscally lean plan came in the form of an amendment by Republican Appropriations Committee ranking member Mario Civera of Delaware County to the Democrat plan &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=95878" class="null"&gt;(HB 1416&lt;/a&gt;), which most expect will be approved today by the same vote. Speculation had been swirling for weeks that Civera had garnered support for his plan from as many as 20 fiscally conservative (a.k.a. &amp;quot;blue dog&amp;quot;) Democrats. This could portend for an even more intensified budget battle, as Senate Republicans remain adamantine in their opposition to broad-based tax increases, which HB 1416 would require because it increases spending by $1.4 billion over last year, with state revenue vastly insufficient to cover such spending because of the worst recession since the Carter years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=218" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/tax+increase/default.aspx">tax increase</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Civera/default.aspx">Civera</category></item><item><title>A Not So Lame Duck</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/13/a-not-so-lame-duck.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:213</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Political lexicographers may have to render the term &amp;quot;lame duck&amp;quot; obsolete thanks to Ed Rendell. The term, used in the context of Pennsylvania&amp;#39;s Governor, refers to a politician who his close to leaving office due to a term limit and has diminished political power, as other elected officials are less inclined to cooperate with him. But Rendell is proving to be anything but lame in the next to last state budget process of his tenure. Most recently, the governor threatened to veto any budget, be it crafted by Republicans or is own Democratic Party, which doesn&amp;#39;t meet his persnickety specifications. And the governor&amp;#39;s veto can only be overridden by two-thirds of the members of both houses of the General Assembly, which means 34 Senators and 136 Representatives. With only 30 Republicans in the Senate and 97 voting Republicans (and perhaps as many as 20 fiscally conservative &amp;quot;blue dog&amp;quot; Democrats) in the House, it is unlikely that Rendell&amp;#39;s obstinence can be easily overcome. Long story short: It may very well be a &lt;a href="http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090713/NEWS04/907130308" class="null"&gt;long, hot summer in the Capitol.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=213" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Rendell/default.aspx">Rendell</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/lame+duck/default.aspx">lame duck</category></item><item><title>Anti-Child Porn Bill Headed to Gov's Desk</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/10/anti-child-porn-bill-headed-to-gov-s-desk.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:207</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Legislation that would make it a crime to view child pornography has passed both the House and Senate and is now heading to the governor for his signature. &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/2009-HB-89" class="null"&gt;House Bill 89&lt;/a&gt;, authored by &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?EntityID=17617&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;Rep. Jennifer Mann&lt;/a&gt;, also covers mediums other than the Internet, including video and photographic images.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=207" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Rep.+Jennifer+Mann/default.aspx">Rep. Jennifer Mann</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/child+pornography/default.aspx">child pornography</category></item><item><title>Senate sends gaming reform to the House</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/09/senate-sends-gaming-reform-to-the-house.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:206</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The state Senate has approved &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=99085" class="null"&gt;legislation (SB 711)&lt;/a&gt; making sweeping reforms to the law governing casinos in Pennsylvania. Some major provisions in Senate Bill 711 include: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prohibiting political campaign contributions by individuals and entities subject to the Gaming Act. Prohibiting future board members from having any outside employment. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Expanding the automatic felony ban provisions of the Act to include a lifetime ban on applicants with a felony conviction who seek a principal or key employee license. For all other license or permit applications, the existing automatic 15-year ban remains in place. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prohibiting employees of the PGCB, including attorneys, from being employed by any regulated entity for a period of two years after leaving the PGCB. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senate Bill 711 will be considered the House of Representatives. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=206" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/gaming+reform/default.aspx">gaming reform</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Earll/default.aspx">Earll</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/slot+machines/default.aspx">slot machines</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/gambling/default.aspx">gambling</category></item><item><title>Senate might consider outlawing texting while driving</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/07/senate-might-consider-outlawing-texting-while-driving.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:204</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The Senate this week is likely to consider legislation &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/2009-SB-143" class="null"&gt;(SB 143)&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?EntityID=17459&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;Sen. Tommy Tomlinson&lt;/a&gt; that would make it a crime to use a hand-held wireless device to send, read, or write a text message while driving. Those in violation would be guilty of a summary offense and subject to maximum fine of $100.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=204" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/driving/default.aspx">driving</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Tomlinson/default.aspx">Tomlinson</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/texting/default.aspx">texting</category></item><item><title>Energy Bills to Watch</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/07/energy-bills-to-watch.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:203</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;As the budget battle roils on, a couple key energy bills could spring to the fore. The first is &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=89356" class="null"&gt;House Bill 1489&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?EntityID=17557&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;Rep. Bud George&lt;/a&gt;, which would levy a tax on the severance of natural gas. The tax would be 5% of the gross value of natural gas severed at the wellhead, plus 4.7 cents per thousand cubic feet of natural gas severed. To understand the profound effects of imposing such duties uponnatural gas, in terms of jobs and our state&amp;#39;s economy, &lt;a href="http://www.commonwealthfoundation.org/commentary/taxing-infant-industry-death" class="null"&gt;click here.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second piece of legislation to watch is &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=89356" class="null"&gt;House Bill 786&lt;/a&gt;, also by &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?EntityID=17557&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;Rep. George&lt;/a&gt;, which would establish the State Energy Office and empower it to: promote the development of the Commonwealth&amp;#39;s indigenous and renewable energy resources through programs involving information and technical and financial assistance; to be the point of contact for private and government energy matters and the lead Commonwealth agency for energy policy development; and to promote the establishment of a Commonwealth liquid fuels reserve and programs for the Commonwealth to ensure continuity of government operations in the event of an emergency.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=203" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/natural+gas/default.aspx">natural gas</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Rep.+Bud+George/default.aspx">Rep. Bud George</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/natural+gas+severance+tax/default.aspx">natural gas severance tax</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/energy/default.aspx">energy</category></item><item><title>Gov Signs Mortgage Fraud Prevention Measures</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/02/gov-signs-mortgage-fraud-prevention-measures.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:196</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Gov. Ed Rendell this week signed into law two bills designed to help prevent mortgage fraud. The first measure &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=90892" class="null"&gt;(HB 985),&lt;/a&gt; authored by Berks County &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?Results=10&amp;amp;StartDate=1%2F1%2F2009&amp;amp;EndDate=12%2F31%2F2010&amp;amp;EntityID=17615&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;Rep. David Kessler&lt;/a&gt;, prohibits financial institutions from firing, or threatening, or discriminating or retaliating against an employee for: 1) reporting to the employer or to the appropriate authority a violation of the law; or 2) damages arising out of the employee&amp;#39;s having participated in an investigation, hearing or inquiry held by an appropriate authority or in a court action relating to a violation of the law. The second measure &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=76490" class="null"&gt;(SB 170),&lt;/a&gt; authored by &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?EntityID=17424&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;Sen. Mike Brubaker&lt;/a&gt; of Lancaster County, will prohibit a mortgage broker or originator from being the exclusive recipient of communications to a consumer, such as a mortgage payment invoice or 1096 interest statement. The law is designed to prevent brokers from withholding information about interest rates, fees or monthly payments, and it to ensure that consumers are informed of the terms of their mortgage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=196" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/mortgage+fraud/default.aspx">mortgage fraud</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Kessler/default.aspx">Kessler</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Brubaker/default.aspx">Brubaker</category></item><item><title>Healthcare Reform on the Move</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/07/01/healthcare-reform-on-the-move.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:195</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;On nearly a straight-party-line vote, the &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=98549" class="null"&gt;state House has passed legislation (HB 1)&lt;/a&gt; that would significantly enhance the benefits provided to enrollees in the Pennsylvania adultBasic health insurance program for low-income individuals. Those benefits would include coverage for prescription drugs, chronic disease management, preventive and wellness care, and behavioral health care. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bill would also double the number of people able to access adultBasic from 45,000 to 90,000. AdultBasic is designed for people who earn too much money to qualify for Medicaid but can&amp;#39;t afford private insurance. An individual is eligible for adultBasic if he or she earns $21,600 or less; a family of four can earn $44,000 or less. The Governor&amp;#39;s administration says the cost of House Bill 1, an estimated $130 million, would be covered with federal Medicaid dollars. Repubilcans are skeptical that the cost can be covered, especially when PA faces a budget shortfall of over $3 billion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=195" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/health+care/default.aspx">health care</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/adultBasic/default.aspx">adultBasic</category></item><item><title>PennWATCH Spending Database</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/06/30/pennwatch-spending-database.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:192</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Rep. Jim Christiana has introduced &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/2009-HB-1460" class="null"&gt;legislation (HB 1460)&lt;/a&gt; that would establish an online database of all expenditures by state government, including contracts. The database would empower each taxpayer to become a watchdog by seeing how every penny of his hard-earned money is being spent by state government. As a taxpayer, would you find such a database a valuable in monitoring how state government spends your money?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=192" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/transparency/default.aspx">transparency</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/PennWATCH/default.aspx">PennWATCH</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Christiana/default.aspx">Christiana</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/spending+database/default.aspx">spending database</category></item><item><title>Tax Amnesty Could Ameliorate Budget Woes</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/06/29/tax-amnesty-could-ameliorate-budget-woes.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:191</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Rep. John Bear has an idea for producing some revenue the state&amp;#39;s coffers could sorely use right now. He&amp;#39;s introduced legislation (HB 1627) that would give amnesty to delinquent state taxpayers who come forward and pay their taxes and interest due. The plan has worked recently in New Jersey, generating hundreds of millions of dollars for the Garden State&amp;#39;s coffers, and Pennsylvania under Gov. Ridge in the mid-90s.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=191" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/taxes/default.aspx">taxes</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/tax+amnesty+program/default.aspx">tax amnesty program</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Rep.+John+Bear/default.aspx">Rep. John Bear</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/tax+amnesty/default.aspx">tax amnesty</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/tax+revenue/default.aspx">tax revenue</category></item><item><title>Slots Reform Bill Moves Forward</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/06/24/slots-reform-bill-moves-forward.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:190</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The Senate Committee on Community, Economic and Recreational Development has approved &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/2009-SB-711" class="null"&gt;legislation (SB 711)&lt;/a&gt; by its chairman, &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?EntityID=17428&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;Sen. Jane Earll&lt;/a&gt;, that would make a number of revisions to the slots casino law, including placing a ban on contributions from casino officials to the political campaigns of state legislators and state officials such as the governor. The bill also bans members of the Gaming Control Board from holding outside employment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=190" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/gaming+reform/default.aspx">gaming reform</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/slots/default.aspx">slots</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Earll/default.aspx">Earll</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/slot+machines/default.aspx">slot machines</category></item><item><title>Defusing the Pension Bomb That Threatens to Explode Your Tax Bill </title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/06/23/defusing-the-pension-bomb-that-threatens-to-explode-your-tax-bill.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:189</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.timesonline.com/articles/2009/06/21/opinion/editorials/doc4a3b9562b63ba827772878.txt" class="null"&gt;As a recent editorial in the Beaver County Times points out&lt;/a&gt;, Harrisburg has a big financial problem to deal with in the form of the two state pension funds, SERS and PSERS. The former is for state workers, the latter is for public school employees. Each holds billions of dollars of debt that will come crashing down on the taxpayers in a few years. And we&amp;#39;re not even taking into account the various municipal pension plans around the state, such as those in Allentown and Philly, which have their own financial difficulties. Pension reform legislation has been introduced in the House and Senate that would serve to alleviate matters. &lt;a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS/Legis/PN/Public/btCheck.cfm?txtType=PDF&amp;amp;sessYr=2009&amp;amp;sessInd=0&amp;amp;billBody=S&amp;amp;billTyp=B&amp;amp;billNbr=0566&amp;amp;pn=0577" class="null"&gt;The bill&lt;/a&gt; -- introduced by &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?EntityID=17521&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;Rep. Scott Boyd&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?EntityID=17423&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;Sen. Pat Browne&lt;/a&gt;, would create a single, uniform defined-contribution pension system for all state, county, municipal and school district employees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=189" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Pat+Browne/default.aspx">Pat Browne</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/pension+reform/default.aspx">pension reform</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Scott+Boyd/default.aspx">Scott Boyd</category></item><item><title>PA to Get Table Games? </title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/06/22/pa-to-get-table-games.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:184</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Speculation is spinning like, well, a roulette wheel, that &lt;a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09173/979046-454.stm" class="null"&gt;table games have closed the budget divide between Republicans and Democrats&lt;/a&gt;. Embattled House Majority Whip Bill DeWeese of Greene County has introduced &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=98884" class="null"&gt;House Bill 21&lt;/a&gt; (not coincidentally numbered), which would legalize poker, blackjack, etc., at PA&amp;#39;s 14 slots casinos. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=184" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/table+games/default.aspx">table games</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/poker/default.aspx">poker</category></item><item><title>Managing Obesity </title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/06/19/managing-obesity.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:173</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Americans are, on average, obese. &lt;a href="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/SearchVotes.aspx?EntityID=17527&amp;amp;Keywords=&amp;amp;op=Search" class="null"&gt;State Representative Peter Daley&lt;/a&gt; is doing his part to help Americans eat better by introducing the &lt;a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS/Legis/PN/Public/btCheck.cfm?txtType=PDF&amp;amp;sessYr=2009&amp;amp;sessInd=0&amp;amp;billBody=H&amp;amp;billTyp=B&amp;amp;billNbr=0032&amp;amp;pn=1726" class="null"&gt;Menu Labeling Act&lt;/a&gt;, which would require food establisments in PA to disclose certain nutritional information about their menu items, including their content of calories, sodium, carbohydrates, and saturated fat.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=173" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Menu+Labeling+Act/default.aspx">Menu Labeling Act</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/obesity/default.aspx">obesity</category></item><item><title>Poker for Pension Funds</title><link>http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/2009/06/18/poker-for-pension-funds.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">47f8b306-1df1-480c-adad-1da7c4742354:172</guid><dc:creator>PA Votes Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;As reported by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review,&amp;nbsp;a Republican State Representative from the Lehigh Valley, Douglas Reichley, is &lt;a href="http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_629824.html" class="null"&gt;developing a bill to legalize table games&lt;/a&gt; and appropriate all the revenue from such games to the State Employee Retirement System (SERS) Fund and the Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) Fund. In 2012, an avalanche of public employee pension fund debt is forecasted to come crashing down on PA. In 2001, lawmakers gave themselves a 50 percent boost in their pension benefit, while all other state employees received a 25 percent boost. Then 9/11 came, a recession ensued, and return on the funds&amp;#39; investments tanked, leading in large part to the present financial problems in the SERS and PSERS. Any bets on whether or not Reichley will succeed in getting his table games legislation passed?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/aggbug.aspx?PostID=172" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/table+games/default.aspx">table games</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/PSERS/default.aspx">PSERS</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/roullette/default.aspx">roullette</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/SERS/default.aspx">SERS</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/poker/default.aspx">poker</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/craps/default.aspx">craps</category><category domain="http://www.pennsylvaniavotes.org/forum/blogs/pennsylvaniavotes/archive/tags/Reichley/default.aspx">Reichley</category></item></channel></rss>
